Poorly Written Report Free Essays

Example of a Poorly Written Report â€Å"Loose Bolts? † February 30, 1973 The film â€Å"Loose Bolts? † is an analysis of what became known as the Lordstown syndrome by business week magazine. Interviews with workers, foremen, and union officials in this film show how a bored and dissatisfied works turns out cars (Chevy Vega’s) with major flaws. I recommend this film to anyone interested in the study of worker attitudes. We will write a custom essay sample on Poorly Written Report or any similar topic only for you Order Now – Paul Marshall, Professor of Management, Harvard Business School The filmmaker is skillful and perceptive in portraying the boredom and hopelessness of the men in this factory. † – Roberta Peterson This case involves inserting ourselves at the anus level of management who supervise approximately many workers on an assembly line at the Lordstown, Ohio, GM plant in 1972. Our goal is to come up with some meaningful differences we could have made as a foremen in improving employee-management relations at that time. Our primary goal is to improve worker-management relationships. From Loose Bolts, â€Å"The ideal foreman could not let the people he managed know he is in agreement with them. If he is in sympathy with the people, he is dead as a foreman or as a supervisor. He’s lost the ballgame as far as conducting his job satisfactorily as a member of management. † If we read this quote and believe in it, our analysis should stop right here, it ain’t worth wasting our time no more†¦. but we believe their are some things foremen could have been done to improve lots and lots of things in the plant. High management often referred to assembly line workers as idiots. In spite of this, it was not necessary for a foreman to continue this behavior and treat and refer to his subordinates as â€Å"idiots†, or treat them like dumb asses. It ain’t that hard to treat people with a little r-e-s-p-e-k-t. Workers had suggestions about how to improve work performance on the assembly line, but the half-baked foremen never passed them along to upper management. Another quote from â€Å"Loose Bolts? â€Å", â€Å"The whole plant runs on fear. Everybody’s scared, from the top down. † â€Å"General Motors imported foremen from existing GM plants. General Motors thus inadvertently channeled the energies and sympathies of ambitious young workers away from the company and into union activism. From the beginning, the plant was a site of labor-management conflict. † (Joseph A. Arena, â€Å"The Little Car that Did Nothing Right: the 1972 Lordstown Assembly Strike, the Chevrolet Vega, and the Unraveling of Growth Economics†) Lee Iacoocoo CEO, Chrysler Motors How to cite Poorly Written Report, Essay examples

Globalisation the Survival Saviour and Opportunist Strategy

Question: Discuss about the Globalisation the Survival Saviour and Opportunist Strategy. Answer: Introduction: Many of the local firms grow big over a period of time outgrows the territory to seek more opportunities. Every firm that is operating seeks the profit motive which initially limited to a geographical area, expands with the firm defining the market. This might be true for some firms who want to move away from stagnated or fiercely competitive market while going global may actually can be opportunities galore. In this essay we analyse how globalisation is a survival or an opportunist strategy for firms. Survival Firms around the world are typically engaged in revenue generation have realised that leadership in market share further leads to conquests of globalisation. The influx of western firms starting from Coca Cola invading the world, showed that core competency and first mover advantage to penetrate a new market with a new product can be worthwhile effort. However, the operations perspective resulting into either profit or loss is totally dependent on external and internal factors and the management affects firm level survival. The use of resources and optimising it to a level to achieve growth can fall short at any time. Loss making firms increasingly can become wary when the number of domestic players is more, while each of them is fighting for the market share and profits. A situation arrives when firm survival is dependent on investing selectively to avoid the losses. Inability to do new product or service development, or lack of new innovation often forces firms to choose either to harvest or divest (Lane, 2013). It also looks for selective markets beyond its geographical boundaries as the PLC (product life cycle) enters the decline phase resulting into losses. The decline in the operations and market response, the ability of trailing firms copying the innovator is a common response of decline as most of the followers are able to produce at fraction of the cost. Opportunity The other perspective of firm level expansion, is to ride the boom of its domestic success and exploit the market beyond the national boundaries. The entry into the nearest neighbouring country is typically the first choice of the firms as culture, climate and trends are similar rather than investing in the other side of the globe. Opportunity in other nations happens as FDI (foreign direct investment) as a green field project saving in the form of tax, or through JV (joint venture, MA (merger and acquisition) (Kuma Liu, 2005). Opportunity of globalisation of markets can lead to further globalisation of production, which leads to transnational firm to succeed in multiple markets. The key issue here is the cost factor that is ignored when the accessing of international markets yields more profits than that of the domestic market. Opportunity of product development being exported between regional trading blocs is seen as the first step that shows that the model suffices the economic a ctivity justification. Dreher et al. (2008) opined that the firms realising the profit making capability often stop importing, and resort to take opportunities as development prospects. The firm level knowledge therefore benefits from the comparative advantages as exploiting different markets broadens the learning horizon about new markets. Most importantly it is able to manage the survival risk of obsolescence in domestic market and is able to manoeuvre to exploit the profitability through globalisation route (Scholte, 2008). The blessing is the inequalities of each country that translates into a business opportunity therefore lies in the ability of the firm to scan the external environment. Conversely, globalisation is leading the firms to create a level of interdependency and spreading the risks that saves from failing to survive in just one country. Interestingly, the firms are finding the global forces of demand supply and the international level market competition more significant in terms of profit generation. Neary (2003) added that the argument goes against as the global level of competition that is perhaps more profound but the opportunities are plenty as well. It is evident that there are rise in investment level from the firm level in internationalisation process is outstripped by the gains than domestic operations before. Conclusion: The globalisation issue thus is a saviour to both ailing and profiting businesses that results in expanding the operations beyond the national limits. The success probability depends on the competition level, economic development and policies between two countries that affect the operations at the firm level. The opportunity of raw material availability, low cost labour is a soon for opportunist firms which override aggregate efforts against the cost advantages of being global. It isalso true that to spread risks, globalisation is the only powerful strategy which can change the firm future. As the world is evolving, the increasing trend is to seek the core competencies that are evident in SMEs unlike large MNC, and striving to globalise that is seen as opportunity. Essay 2: Advantage and Comparative Advantage trade theories with differences and limitations. The trade theories of comparative and absolute advantage are firm level decisions which allow how the trading is being carried out by managers to benefit the firm. It is evident that everyone is trying to maximise profits is seeking to increase the geographic boundaries. In this essay we will analyse how both are the cornerstones of firm level operations in economics perspective. Absolute advantage: The principle of absolute advantage is defined by the ability of a party to produce product or services in larger volumes than its competitors deploying same amount of resources. Laid down by Adam Smith, this principle in the context of international trade states that labour is an input and is the key differentiator i.e. to show ability to produce specific items at lower opportunity cost. For a country, it can mean to be more productive and also cost effective from firm perspective (Neary, 2003). An example of Japanese car manufacturer Toyota has less than 5 defects in its cars against the US average of 125 forced the Toyota to import from Japan instead of choosing suppliers in US. The Yen against dollar hence led to profits for importing OEM Japanese automobile spares of highest quality. Comparative Advantage: The principle of comparative advantage is about how the countries determining the process of what to produce as goods and services. Propounded by Ricardo, this principle is about the capability of the firm to produce goods or services that has lower marginal cost and opportunity cost against the other one (Costinot, 2009). For a firm perspective it allows the company to sell goods at a much lower price than that of the competitors. The comparative advantage has been criticised as there can be situations where the firm level competition in the global market can result in export subsidies, import restriction that debars foreign players to compete with national firms which is protectionist in nature. On the contrary the ability to define trade and blocks as free (Japan, Taiwan) trade zones fuelling success in Asia is justified as the value driven society are more methodical in approach to work (Costinot et al. 2015). It has also the other side of ability to produce at low cost is tied to the manner in which inputs like resources, employee competencies are defined in any firm. Going by the perfect competition theory, therefore states that no firm can have cost advantage, if they lack the ability to buy at low (raw materials, avail employee competencies). So comparative advantage can be turned into a competitive advantage if the external environment is scanned and internals are aligned to produce increased value out put relative to competitors. Hence, Hunt Morgan (1995) argued that the competition is a tug of war, between firms and nations that are able to seek comparative advantage in seeking and deploying resources to defined a competitive advantage market place position. Therefore, the there can be comparative advantage to produce at lower opportunity cost, while country can have absolute advantage in it but still have comparative advantages. Though, it assumes that markets are perfectly competitive and is too simplistic for empirical analysis and is ideal between two countries, not for multi country, multi trade models (Costinot, 2009). It is too short term where the relative low cost is sought in labour, raw materials fluctuates as is dependent on management, technology at national or firm level. Conclusion: The world trade and its trends, patterns show the comparative advantage theory ignores the exchange rates or relative prices and that the markets are competitive which changes with time. It is however, vital issue as no country has comparative advantage that changes over time. Bernard et al. (2007) stated that Vietnam is leading coffee production that it did not have earlier, so it developed comparative advantage as a country after researching on the world markets. This leaves us to the choice and manner in which a country, firm or an individual perceives to use these theories. The above discussion therefore is in duality with the comparative advantage that is more dynamic as absolute state of advantage may not last forever. References: Bernard, A.B., Redding, S.J. Schott, P.K., 2007. Comparative advantage and heterogeneous firms. Review of Economic Studies, 74(1), pp.3166. Costinot, A. et al., 2015. Comparative advantage and optimal trade policy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), pp.659702. Costinot, A., 2009. On the origins of comparative advantage. Journal of International Economics, 77(2), pp.255264. Hunt, S.D. Morgan, R.M., 1995. the Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), pp.115. Available at: ://WOS:A1995QQ63900001. Dreher, A., Gaston, N. Martens, P., 2008. Measuring Globalisation: Gauging Its Consequences, Available at: https://books.google.de/books?hl=enlr=id=gQLacTLUbzECoi=fndpg=PA1dq=axel+dreher+globalization+indexots=AnZmqp77h6sig=X3KtETTIfCIUgujOJ1wMYVWSsY0. Kuma, S. Liu, D., 2005. Impact of globalisation on entrepreneurial enterprises in the world markets. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 2(1), pp.4664. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33645156249partnerID=40md5=6d4e3a1878483d972863bc0c524d3503. Lane, P.R., 2013. Financial Globalisation and the Crisis. Open Economies Review, 24(3), pp.555580. Scholte, J.A., 2008. Defining globalisation. In World Economy. pp. 14711502. Costinot, A., 2009. An Elementary Theory of Comparative Advantage. Econometrica, 77(4), pp.11651192. Neary, J.P., 2003. Competitive versus Comparative Advantage. World Economy, 26(4), pp.457470. Available at: 10.1111/1467-9701.00532nhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=truedb=buhAN=10090720site=ehost-live.

Scole Experiment Essay Example

Scole Experiment Essay The Scale Experiment Best evidence of life after death ever. This is what this documentary film is pointing out. Is there really a life after death? Well this film makes me believe more that there is indeed a life after death. However, how can scientific evidence explain life after death? Now this film showed me how. The ninety-minute documentary film is about the Scale Experiment, which is a five- year investigation into life after death. It is conducted by members of the Society for Physical Research (SSP) In the late offs In Scale village In England. Tim Coleman, the director, collaborated with the Scale Group and the surviving SSP Investigators and was able to interview the visitors of the experiment and was able to see some of the audio/video recordings made by the group. According to the film, there were overall six mediums and fifteen Investigators from the SSP. Most paranormal phenomena showed In this film Is the evidence of afterlife particularly physical mediums such as disembodied voices from old radios and tape recorders, ghostly lights fluttering about the room and inside the bodies of the investigators, images appearing on film inside secured containers, reports of touches from unseen hands, levitation of the table, ancient things appearing Inside secured rooms and matter becoming immaterial. As observed in the documentary film, there are numerous investigators and sitters involved, comprised not just by paranormal experts but also renowned scientists, due to the large number and consistency of paranormal phenomena shown without any fraud observed, many acclaimed that Scale experiment Is really true. I mean how can they get so many big and prominent psychics, scientists, and investigators speak up to their film if the experiment is Just a hoax? I dont think these people can afford to disrupt their good reputation by participating in such a hoax. We will write a custom essay sample on Scole Experiment specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Scole Experiment specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Scole Experiment specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Hence, this must be really true evidence that humans have spirits; they have life after death and can do some Interaction with the living people revealing some conjuring powers. Despite the responses and perceptions of the experts In the film that makes the Information disseminated reliable. I do not have a guarantee that the filmmakers do not make use of any trickery. I dont say that it is a hoax for using some trickery but what Im saying is that not every single thing must be believed in. There can be instances that filmmakers want their films to be very realistic where easy minds can undoubtedly considered thats why they make use of trickery, First critic point I would like to argue is the use of radiant wristbands to prove that the sitters were not moving during their experiment in the dark room. Yes it is essential to prove that no one can move during the experiment to explain the ghostlike phenomena happening UT according to my research, professionals said that most s ©once performances used this trick. It Is also said In my research that the wristbands used at Scale were never subjected to testing, no one really knows what happen to these wristbands 1 OFF these wristbands. Another thing is that there is no hand holding that happened in the experiment, which makes it easier to escape. Thus, for me, the video of fluttering lights in the dark room is nothing impressive. I mean every paranormal experiment make use of that trick Just to show their audience that there were no deceptions intended! Nevertheless, I see the Scale group as the usual people who do an experiment and of course want to attain great recognition by their audience thats why the authors are somehow biased on the details they report in the film, my second critic point. For me, its innate for filmmakers to be biased. I say biased in a sense that their witnesses in the dark room are only the authors of the Scale report that say that the sitters never moved their hands. It is very expected that these authors would say that they were not fooled! Even if I myself was part of the filming, I will force myself to live that everything we do in the experiment is true! But if I were part of a critic audience, I would not have stayed in my seat and watched the experiment happen without examining the sitters and the equipment and observing their preparations. Thats what wise critics do right? In spite of these possible trickery and bias, it doesnt make the afterlife probability any less true. Yes there is a small chance of trickery and bias but there is a larger chance that realms of afterlife can only explain these paranormal phenomena. I say there are lots of phenomena that are unexplainable in the film! I have my 3 biggest inscrutable phenomena! First is the manifestation of different enigmatic images on film cartridges, but what makes it supernatural is that the cartridges were placed inside a padlocked box and the room where the film developed is completely dark. Where can those images come from? No one can explain! What makes it more peculiar is the hidden message in those images, significant images from the past. Most images are those who have stories behind it, like it lead us to the need to rediscover something from the past. Second is the appearance of ancient things inside the dark room out of nowhere that same with the images, it seem that it lead us to a significant something from the past. One might think that it can be fraudulent given that the people from the Scale experiment are mostly old people and they can keep those ancient things with their selves. But no one from the group lives for like a hundred years ago! Those ancient things are really ancient that are really inexistent in todays generation but here it is now and no one knows where it really came from. And the Scale group would not be that desperate to spend big mount of money Just to check the validity of those ancient things if they arent really interested to what this phenomena means. Meaning, they certainly have no idea. Lastly is the disembodied voice from old radios and tape recorders. I find it the creepiest evidence in this film given that the investigators proved that there is no any connection found in the old radios and tape recorders, they even tried it without energy source but still the voices went on. Similar to other phenomena, the voices came from significant people of the past who seem to have unfinished business ere on earth, a Scale scientist who had passed away, children who had passed away and left their parents, and other dead people who have an important message for away but then suddenly goes back? The answer is that because they still need something from you or they really dont want to go away in the first place. Its the hidden notion of all these phenomena, its unexplainable but if youre going to view it in another perspective, these spirits from afterlife interact with the people on earth for a reason. For me, the best evidence of afterlife is not purely scientific; you cannot expect science, which is a human-made study, to explain the wonder of afterlife where humans never have a complete access. I think this is the reason why Scale experiment has not been a mainstream study. This is actually the first time I heard about it. If Scale experiment is truly the best evidence of life after death, then it would have made worldwide headlines and it would be the most talked about science all over the world, but why didnt that happened? Its simply because scientific evidence is not enough to prove after life. The Scale experiment might be rue but it must explore more than Just the scientific evidence of afterlife, in order for it to be called the best evidence of afterlife. But if someone would ask me, do I believe in life after death? Yes I am! And its not Just a mere faith basis! Aside from the supporting scientific evidence, there are many near death experience that showed that there is indeed something after death. Humans might not have a complete access to afterlife but some do have a glimpse access and were able to communicate it to the life on earth, which is for me more reliable than any scientific evidence.

The Thirteenth Amendment and Jim Crow Laws

The Thirteenth Amendment and Jim Crow Laws Free Online Research Papers After the Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery in America, racial discrimination became regulated by the so called Jim Crow laws, which mandated strict segregation of the races. Though such laws were instituted shortly after fighting ended in many cases, they only became formalized after the end of Republican-enforced Reconstruction in the 1870s and 80s during a period known as the nadir of American race relations. This legalized segregation lasted up to the mid-1960s, primarily through the deep and extensive power of Southern Democrats. Chief justice Warren needed to convince the other justices that unanimous decision would hold stronger in the public eye. He had to bring the nation together and not make the desegregation issue about the south against the north. This would publicly be a major setback for the nation. Justices court in the Plessey v Ferguson case of 1896 was obsolete. The omission of remedy was a smart decision made by Justice Warren because it falls under an essent ial rhetorical situation. In the Brown case the rhetorical strategy of omission of remedy was used by Justice Warren to gain unanimity among the justices of the Supreme Court, by declaring segregation unconstitutional and not attaching a solution to it. This strategy would buy the courts time and help persuade the public schools hence forth the remedy issue would be addressed at a later time, gaining a unanimous decision among the justices. Before writing the Brown opinion Chief Justice took a few things under consideration in order to put together an opinion which would persuade his audience. The First step was accepting the cases. The NAACP was putting pressure on the courts to address the issue of desegregation. The supreme courts image and credibility was at stake, if it kept avoiding this issue. By consolidating South Carolina, Kansas and Virginia, Bolling v Sharpe and the Delaware case, and making Brown the first case, this would draw less attention to the southern Region of the country. The Brown case would be a National problem not a southern one. The Rhetorical consideration in the Brown case was to have the Supreme Court make a unanimous decision. A unanimous decision is thought to convey the message more forcefully than split decisions. Even though Chief Justice Warren made his position clear at the conference in December of 1953, he did not allow a vote to be taken for fear of dividing the court. A lot of discussions of the case continued until a vote was finally taken. â€Å"During this time, Chief Justice bargained, wheedled and cajoled until the most important members of his audience, Justice Clark, Reed, Frankfurter and Jackson were all convinced to join in a single unanimous opinion (Prentice, 109).† Unanimity was ultimately reached in Brown I. After Chief Justice Vinson’s last term there was eighty percent dissension in most desegregation cases. When Chief Justice Warren took over he made it clear he supported the end of the separate but equal doctrine. Lastly is choosing the author. A rhetorical ploy in the Brown case was to choose an author to write the opinion of the Supreme Court. Choosing a southern justice would not have a persuasive impact among the courts as well as the public. Chief Justice Warren felt that he should write it to bring the biggest impact. It would also bring a serious persuasive atmosphere to the decision of the court. The rhetorical strategy of Unanimity was also used in the Supreme Court in the Brown v. Board decision according to Prentice. Chief Justice Earl Warren wanted to make sure all nine justices agreed on the issue. By having all nine justices agree on their decision, this showed a concrete and â€Å"forceful† decision that would be enforced and changed immediately. If there was a dissenting opinion, there would be a group of rebels who would use the opinion as support only causing more chaos and possible harm on America. Warren did not wanted a divided court, because this would weaken the court’s decision in the public’s eye. By the court standing as unanimous, it made the public feel as if the whole country was behind the decision. Prentice believes this was a rhetorical strategy used by the court, because it’s a technique that court uses when they feel the institution is â€Å"threatened.† The Chief Justice opinion addressed all and affected everyone who would partake in the American school system. According to Prentice, the court used rhetorical strategy by making sure Chief Justice Warren wrote one concrete opinion. If the court chose a justice that was from a certain part of the country, for example, the rest of the country, especially those in favor of segregation would feel that this was a decision based solely on the opinion of a certain demographic population of the country. The Chief Justice stands as an authoritative figure in the Supreme Court thus creating one opinion in order to show the national public that this case was extremely important and the decision was not open for interpretation. The omission of remedy was a rhetorical technique used in choosing the author as well. The court needed to show indirectly that they needed to correct the bad without losing credibility or overruling past precedents. Another reason why the omission of remedy is a rhetorical situation is the writing of the Brown opinion. Chief Justice had to make sure he was persuasive enough to convince not only the other Justices, but the Court and the community that this case affected. Chief Justice Warren made the opinion of the Court short and sweet for precise reasoning. First reason was to make it clear to the public, no distortion in the decision of the Court. The second he did not include opinionated language which would incite the public. It was short, non-rhetorical, unemotional, and non-accusatory. Justices wanted to fix the problem without accusing anyone of fault. â€Å"Mr. Chief Justice Warren delivered the opinion of the Court. These cases were decided on May 17, 1954. The opinions of that date, declaring the fundamental principle that racial discrimination in public education is unconstitutional (Prentice 111).† The brown opinion contained very little in the way of factual development. Chief Justice Warren considered the possibility that the opinion would be more persuasive if it contained a detailed litany of the sordid mistreatment accorded blacks over the years, coupled with a detailed factual indictment of the failure of the â€Å"separate but equal† doctrine to bring about anything even approaching actual equality between white and black schools. Chief justice Warren apparently concluded that such language would serve primarily to persuade those who already were in agreement with the decision. Those who supported segregation likely would not have changed their minds upon hearing such language, but instead might have reacted even more adversely to an opinion which added insult to injury. Another factor that stood as support to show rhetorical situation in the omission of remedy was the conciseness. Chief Justice Warren created this opinion in a â€Å"KISS† format, keep it short and simple. By doing this, there left no room for the public to interpret his message thus stirring up controversy. The language used in the opinion was ideas as well in that the wording was revised in order to avoid showing a bias as well as showing how the Supreme Court made their decision and what major grounds they made it on. The audience of this decision was a very large number that ranged in various levels of intelligence which made the author of the piece describe the decision in the easiest and most understanding format. This way of writing avoided any media influence on the piece that would misunderstand the objective of it and sway the public’s reaction. Chief Justice Warren also wanted to avoid showing all the hardships of African-American’s, because only th e people in favor of the decision would agree with it. The court’s objective was to alert the public in the new changes that stood before them in the easiest way of understanding with the most minimal way to misinterpret. In summary the brown v board of education case shows how law plays an important role in the Supreme Court’s decisions. It shows how important it was to have the right justice deliver the opinion of the court, which would create the greatest impact. How to keep the decision short and sweet so as not to incite, blame, or distort the issue. It explained how detrimental segregation could be to a certain race, whether mentally, socially or psychologically. In class all the article we read about rhetorical devices or strategies would agree with prentice that rhetoric is a persuasive device. In short rhetoric is sometimes more important than facts. Also the Prentice article on the rhetorical strategies used in the American Court room stands as a guide for the future Supreme Court justices in that it shows how many little factors influence and stand as building blocks in a very controversial and ultimate life changing decision. The American education system stands as a very strong and firm system due to the Brown v. Board of Education case and shows the American people that rhetorical strategies are used every day in professional settings in order to convince the audience it is addressing. The Brown v. Board case serves as one of the most historical and societal precedents in American history today. Prentice showed that Chief Justice Warren’s omission of remedy was a rhetorical situation. Prentice, Robert;† Supreme Court Rhetoric†- Part III (Pages 102- 122) Research Papers on The Thirteenth Amendment and Jim Crow LawsCapital Punishment19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided EraComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoPETSTEL analysis of IndiaBook Review on The Autobiography of Malcolm XMoral and Ethical Issues in Hiring New EmployeesQuebec and CanadaWhere Wild and West MeetThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseThe Effects of Illegal Immigration

Quotes for a Wedding Toast by the Father of the Bride

Quotes for a Wedding Toast by the Father of the Bride For many fathers of the bride, a daughter’s wedding day is a bittersweet occasion. Happiness mingles with sadness at the reality that the little girl who once relied so heavily on her father  is now going out into the world as her own woman and as someone’s wife. A toast on this day marks both an ending and a beginning. Fathers of the bride  can share their love, their pride, and express their best wishes for their daughter’s life going forward. They may even want to impart some wisdom about what it means to be a loving husband and father and what it takes to make a marriage a success. Whether the goal is to be lighthearted and humorous, sentimental and serious, or a little of both, including a few of the following sentiments, will make the father of the bride toast just that more special. Father of the Bride Quotes John Gregory Brown: There’s something like a line of gold thread running through a man’s words when he talks to his daughter, and gradually over the years it gets to be long enough for you to pick up in your hands and weave into a cloth that feels like love itself.  Enid Bagnold: A father is always making his baby into a little woman. And when she is a woman he turns her back again.  Guy Lombardo: Many a man wishes he were strong enough to tear a telephone book in half, especially if he has a teenage daughter.Euripides: To a father growing old nothing is dearer than a daughter.Barbara Kingsolver: It kills you to see them grow up. But I guess it would kill you quicker if they didnt.  Phyllis McGinley: These are my daughters, I suppose. But where in the world did the children vanish?  Goethe: There are two lasting bequests we can give our children. One is roots. The other is wings.Mitch Albom: Parents rarely let go of their children, so children let go of themâ₠¬ ¦It is not until much later†¦that children understand; their stories, and all their accomplishments, sit atop the stories of their mothers and fathers, stones upon stones, beneath the waters of their lives.   H. Norman Wright: In marriage, each partner is to be an encourager rather than a critic, a forgiver rather than a collector of hurts, an enabler rather than a reformer.  Tom Mullen: Happy marriages begin when we marry the ones we love, and they blossom when we love the ones we marry.Leo Tolstoy: What counts in making a happy marriage is not so much how compatible you are, but how you deal with incompatibility.  Ogden Nash: To keep your marriage brimming with love†¦whenever you’re wrong; admit it. Whenever you’re right, shut up.  Friedrich Nietzsche: When marrying, ask yourself this question: Do you believe that you will be able to converse well with this person into your old age? Everything else in marriage is transitory.

Summary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 7

Summary - Essay Example The speech is especially memorable for its remark on firearm suicide, which when taken alongside his later suicide, leads to an increased emotional attachment to the text. In the words present in the speech, Foster makes a concise argument regarding the need for students of a capitalist society to be more aware of their surroundings and the generative possibilities that may be in existence behind antagonisms and frustrations encountered everyday. Wallace opens his speech with a parable-like story of two young fish. He says, â€Å"Two young fish are swimming along and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says, "Morning boys. How's the water?" The two young fish swim on for a bit. Eventually, one of them looks over at the other and goes, what the hell is water (Wallace & Kenyon College 4). Wallace opens his speech in this way with an intended salute to the standard requirement for most speeches in America, which tend to use a parable to lead i nto the main idea. This becomes the theme of the entire speech. The most important and obvious realities are usually the most difficult to discuss. Wallace discards any mention on the importance of a University degree in moving the student forward, preferring to discuss knowledge that can be applied in the world. He goes on to make the point that a University degree does not reflect so much on one’s capacity to think, but instead it reflects the preference of what one will think. While this seems obvious, Wallace is candid in stressing the value of that which is obvious. Foster moves on to contend that all we know concerning the world is visible and under our noses in the media. He contends that, deep down, even when it does not show on us, we see ourselves as the universes’ center. The emotions and thoughts of other individuals must be communicated for us to know them, but it is only possible to focus on what is ours since it is the foremost urge and we consider it re al (Wallace & Kenyon College 4). Foster contends that hope exists if only we realize the hardwired setting that defaults to self-centeredness and make moves in resetting it. He moves that there is a need to shift views and see the world through new lenses while shattering the lens, which sees only the self. Wallace shifts gears while sticking to the original theme, and almost comers across as sympathizing with the graduating students in that they have little idea of the rat race that is ahead of them. He discusses a scenario that rarely makes it onto commencement speeches by giving a daily example that includes, in clear detail, waking up early, traffic jams and long hour days, shopping for dinner groceries, poor lighting in the stores, traffic jams back home, bed, and all this again (Wallace & Kenyon College 5). While graduates have witnessed this lifestyle with their parents, they have not gone through it personally. The reason that people are stuck into the cycle is due to the un iverse-center default setting, as well as one’s own emotions and needs dictating the priorities from the surroundings. However, again, individuals have the choice to place emphasis on the obvious. Wallace is especially emphatic on the need to shift to the obvious. He points out the day-to-day scenario using a different lens. For instance, why get mad in the traffic jam while everyone else is also unhappy? He also

Nutrition Education Intervention Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Nutrition Education Intervention - Assignment Example Only 58.9% had normal weight. The target audience include children and their parents because they both play a significant role in poor eating habits. Children are careless of their eating habits whereas parents fail to successfully discharge their parenting duties. Needs assessment will be carried out by use of questionnaires. The behavioural and/or cognitive changes targeted include children’s eating lifestyles, awareness about healthy eating habits and participation in physical exercises/activities. In order to attract attention of the target audience, fascinating videos and pictures will be incorporated in messages communicated through social media, specifically instagram. A special application supported by android/smart phones will be developed for this purpose. Such development stems from the increased ownership and usage of mobile phones. Promotions on televisions will also be pursued. Al Junaidi, A., Abdulle, A., Hag-Ali, M., and Nagelkerke, N. (2013). The Prevalence and potential determinants of obesity among school children and adolescents in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Obesity, 37, 68-